Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O) and Microsoft (MSFT.O) are again fighting for online dominance after the Google owner created “Bard” in reaction to ChatGPT.
Recently, chatbot AI has completely taken over the news. Microsoft-supported OpenAI’s ChatGPT advancements have slowed down announcements from Google, which has been quietly developing its own Chatbot AI technologies.
Then, over the course of a week, we witnessed both sides make the following development. The GPT language model, which powers ChatGPT, was first introduced by Microsoft as “the new Bing.” Google Bard, an AI chatbot that makes use of a separate language model called Language Model for Dialogue Applications (LaMDA), was then released the following day at an event in Paris as a response.
Google Bard uses Language Model for Dialogue Applications (LaMDA) and gathers answers from the internt. Through this language model, Bard will answer inquiries in greater detail than the ordinary Google search.
Google Bard’s main objective is to obtain information in a straightforward response rather than a search engine results page, but with links for user to find out more just like digital assistants Alexa and Siri,
The goal of Google Bard is to combine the depth of human knowledge with the strength, humor, and originality of its enormous language models. Using the variety of data that is easily accessible online, Bard will respond in a distinctive and accurate manner.
As a personal assistant, Google Bard will also assist with:
- booking vacations
- finding reservations
- organizing meals
The public will be able to use Bard in a few weeks after it has finished testing.
ChatGPT employs machine learning to answer questions in a conversational way. OpenAI released ChatGPT on Nov. 30, 2022. OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman said ChatGPT had 1 million users in five days.
ChatGPT uses the internet-trained GPT-3 language model. ChatGPT answers user queries using GPT-3 language model.
ChatGPT, a large-scale language generation model, has been trained to generate text that resembles human speech. It can be modified for many natural language processing applications, including question answering, translation, and text summarization. Despite the fact that GPT is recognized for its ability to create logical and contextually suitable writing, it occasionally generates text that is biased or incomprehensible.
Popular ChatGPT AI-generated material includes:
- product descriptions,
- summaries of transcripts
- concise explanations of complex topics
- law briefs
- written code
- blog articles
- email drafts
- social media posts
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard
Despite the fact that both Bard and Chat GPT are models of language-based conversational AI, there are significant differences in their intended uses and architecture.
• While Chat GPT occasionally exaggerates stories and makes factual errors, Google Bard is expected to offer customers more trustworthy information.
• If we compare the two chatbots based on information limit, Google’s Bard comes out on top because ChatGPT’s training was only based on data that was made until 2021. In the case of Google’s Bard, the information on the internet is constantly being updated.
• Google Bard gets its information directly from the Internet, unlike ChatGPT, which gets it from the data it was trained on.
• The basic ChatGPT is available to everyone, but Bard has limited access.
• Even though the data that ChatGPT trained on has its own inherent biases, seeking solutions online may not be the best course of action because the internet is uncensored and has its fair share of false information.
• Google Bard will be able to break down complicated concepts into simple, conversation-starting chunks. The goal is to spread knowledge more widely in an approachable manner that would motivate everyone, especially kids, to learn. Contrarily, Chat GPT generates content in response to the text prompt.
Although AI is not now accessible to the general population, it holds enormous potential. There will be an AI battle soon, and it is unknown which AI search engine will win. The increasing use of virtual personal assistants and other smart home technologies is already beginning to alter how we live and conduct business.
Despite these advancements, concerns about job loss and moral implications keep people from using AI in work. It is vital that organizations thoroughly consider the benefits and risks of adopting AI and implement these technologies in an ethical and open manner.
|Chat GPT||Google Bard|
|Source of Information||Data Feed||Internet|
|Limitations||Biasness of data||Biasness of Internet|
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard: Search Engines
▶Bing, Edge, and Teams are the three Microsoft products that already use ChatGPT.
With the same GPT-3.5 language model as ChatGPT, Microsoft Teams Premium has been available for a while and features automated meeting notes, AI-generated chapters to make searching through meeting records easier, and more. Businesses may currently obtain it for $7 per month, but it costs $10 per user per month.
Additionally, Microsoft just introduced “the new Bing,” a revised version of the Bing search engine that runs on GPT-3.5. Microsoft has stated that it is an upgrade on the GPT-3.5 model that powers ChatGPT, however it is unknown at this time if this is the rumoured GPT-4 model or merely a minor upgrade. Instead of being compelled to utilise the conventional search bar, this new version of Bing enables users to communicate with Bing as they would with the ChatGPT chatbot.
Microsoft’s Edge browser will soon feature this version of Bing, along with a sidebar that can talk, create content, and offer insights. This function could come in handy for condensing voluminous material on a webpage into more manageable summaries. On this specific integration, more information is still awaited.
The business has lately revealed that ChatGPT would be incorporated into the Opera web browser in addition to Microsoft. Although the release schedule is not yet known, it may offer features that are comparable to those that the new Bing on the Edge browser will offer.
Additionally, Google’s Bard AI chatbot will be integrated into search, but this time, it will be Google Search. Similar to Bing, it will enable users to conduct searches using an AI-powered chatbot rather than the standard search box. Though these are not specifically Google Bard integrations, Google has also added AI-based features to Lens and Maps.
It will be fascinating to see what other people come up with since Google did say that it will permit third-party developers to use Bard. Similar to GPT, OpenAI gives some businesses access to its capabilities; however, only Microsoft has access to the source code outside of OpenAI.
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard: Free version
Both ChatGPT and Google Bard have free versions available. Let’s look what both offers in their free versions.
▶Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI all desire a quick integration of their own chatbots into their respective ecosystems.
On OpenAI’s website, ChatGPT is now available as a free research preview. However, ChatGPT Plus, a paid subscription service, is now available for $20 and grants customers priority access and quicker speeds. You must join the queue to gain access to ChatGPT Plus because it is only available to individuals that OpenAI approves for access.
▶In contrast, Bard only offers a free model right now, but in order to access the AI chatbot, you must be a “trusted tester.” Although Bard is currently not publicly accessible, Google did announce certain AI-based features that it has added to products like Maps and Lens.
According to Google, Bard’s public access will be disclosed in the “coming weeks.”
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard: Citation
When using chatbot AI like ChatGPT or Google Bard, plagiarism is a major source of controversy. The chatbots’ AI language models need a tons of content produced by third parties to be fed to them in order to be trained on existing knowledge sets.
Humans frequently combine knowledge from primary and secondary sources to create original content; but, whenever they do so, they must cite their sources.
However, ChatGPT does not automatically include sources for the text it generates. If correctly requested, it can disclose sources, although that isn’t the default. In order to avoid unintentionally stealing intellectual property, you must use the chatbot with extreme caution.
Wheras, Bard doesn’t automatically offer citations for its comments.
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard: Similarity
Fundamentally, these two chatbots’ features are rather similar. Both ask you to enter a query or a request, and they both respond with a response if you do. The chatbot will continue to engage in conversation with you as you ask additional inquiries or new requests.
Bard is essentially an extended version of the search engines they have been integrated into, as is the GPT-powered version of Bing. They give the replies more context. Instead than just giving you a link to go on to find out additional information, for instance, if you ask what the system requirements are for a game, it will tell you what they are and what they enable.
Though there are probably more use cases for ChatGPT.
The AI chatbot can produce text to write news articles, fiction poems, product descriptions, blog posts, and more when utilised in its interface on OpenAI’s website. It can even supply the code necessary to develop a simple website because it can handle several coding languages. Although it’s not improbable that Bard or Bing won’t be able to handle these kinds of requests, these capabilities have not yet been shown.
Example of Google Bard
What new discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope can I tell my 9-year-old about? was the question Google posed to Bard in a demonstration. Further inquiry revealed that Bard’s response was inaccurate, but he did not name his sources. Most likely, it came from some source, but if your 9-year-old used it without citing it in a report for school, they would be in trouble.
Strangely, the brand-new GPT-powered chatbot from Bing does credit its sources. You’ll need to click through for more information, although it uses footnotes to list the sources from where it obtained the data. Since the websites it draws from depend on visitors to generate revenue and maintain their online presence, there are legitimate ethical issues regarding the fact that this is still fundamentally intellectual property theft.
Bing is not outright plagiarizing, at least. That so, there is no guarantee that the chatbot was able to cite everything required, so you should still do your research.
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard: ACCURACY
Chatbot AI is not perfect. Even in Google’s demonstration of Bard AI, it gave an inaccurate response to a query occasionally. Both Google and OpenAI freely acknowledge that ChatGPT and Bard can deliver incorrect or improper information.
This mainly depends on how these chatbots function. They make use of language models, GPT-3.5 for ChatGPT and LaMDA for Bard, both of which are extremely information-intensive. A significant portion of this data comes from the internet in the cases of GPT and LaMDA, and in the case of GPT-3.5, only up until 2021, when Open AI stopped developing the language model. The Bing version of GPT is more recent since, like Bard AI, it obtains current information from the internet.
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard: drawbacks
With this training, there are drawbacks, including the possibility of inaccurate or biased information being retrieved and the chatbot’s lack of innate knowledge. The chatbots cannot tell whether or not the information is giving a valid answer or if the answer it is giving is free of inherent biases because they are only trained to offer outputs related to inputs.
Recall the Google demo’s example: “What new discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope can I tell my 9-year-old about?” “JWST took the very first photograph of a planet outside of our own solar system,” was one of the answers.
Google Search revealed, however, that the Very Large Telescope (VLT), in accordance with NASA, captured the first image of a planet outside of our solar system in 2004. Even though the JWST recently captured its first image of an exoplanet, the response is still inaccurate.
Furthermore, inherent bias is crucial and frequently goes unnoticed by these machine learning-trained AI. One instance of this is when ChatGPT was asked to build a series of code that separated good scientists from bad scientists by UC Berkeley professor Steven Piantadosi.
Even though it wasn’t officially asked to do so, the AI ended up excluding the scientists based on their race and gender. Although the AI is not intrinsically racist or sexist, the biases in the data it learned caused it to unintentionally pick up on such biases and produce biased results. Be cautious and double-check the information ChatGPT is giving you.
GOOGLE BARD VS. CHATGPT: Which AI will win?
These AI chatbots are still quite new at the moment. As remarkable as they are, they continue to make errors, create stuff that may possibly be against the law, and are still determining their optimal use cases. Nevertheless, the technology is really powerful. In the case of Bard or the Bing version powered by GPT, might completely alter the way we conduct internet searches.
If you wish to test the innovative technology, you’re probably only able to use the free version of ChatGPT on the OpenAI platform. The waitlists for “the new Bing” and ChatGPT Plus are both presently open, while Google Bard is still only available to “trusted testers.” Although this will probably alter over the next several weeks and months, it is still an unexplored frontier that we are only now starting to encounter.
The text production software from Google and OpenAI is exciting and attractive, but experts warn that it can be quite unreliable. Real-time Internet searches that could produce hate speech, racial and gender stereotypes, and other inappropriate content might lead to problems and lessen the appeal of these new software.
Given that OpenAI is developing ChatGPT in the open, Google has admittedly taken a more cautious approach for Bard. This may be because the stakes are bigger for the enormous firm. In a 2020 draught research paper, Google’s AI researchers had issued a warning regarding the use of text generation technology. This angered some business officials and resulted in the termination of two well-known researchers, Timnit Gebru and Margaret Mitchell.