Are you new to the field of academia?
Do you wish to gain in-depth understanding of your field by learning how to write a good review paper?
This article will teach you how to write the best review paper using a systematic, step-by-step procedure and a sample review article format in order to get more citations.
review paper
Also known as a literature review, it’s a comprehensive analysis of previously published works, offering insights into the latest research findings on a specific topic, presented in chronological order.
The primary aim of a review paper is to critically assess existing data or results, achieved through methods like analysis, modeling, classification, comparison, and summary. Such papers are invaluable for pinpointing research gaps and exploring potential areas for further investigation.
It helps to draw new conclusions from previously published works.
Before starting on research in a particular area, scholars, researchers, or scientists typically start by consulting relevant review articles. This practice allows them to grasp the existing research gaps, which aids in formulating a clear problem statement for their own study.
Writing a review article offers clarity, introduces fresh perspectives, and makes valuable contributions to the research domain. It necessitates a deep comprehension of the subject matter and a carefully organized presentation of discussions and arguments.
It’s worth noting that some journals exclusively publish review papers and may not accept regular research articles. Therefore, it’s crucial to familiarize yourself with the submission guidelines of your target journal.
tips to write a Good review paper
Here are some helpful tips to write a great review paper:
- Pick a topic that suits you and understand it well.
- Use the most recent sources that relate to your topic.
- Point out any gaps in recent studies and analyze them closely.
- Describe your methodology in a detailed methods section.
- Before you submit your paper, make sure it’s original and doesn’t contain any plagiarism.
aim of a review paper
The primary aim of a review paper is to evaluate a particular research question or theoretical/practical approach, offering readers a comprehensive understanding of the research area’s current state. The specific purposes of review papers may vary depending on their type and research objectives.
Here are some common purposes:
- Provide a comprehensive overview: Offer a unified and collective summary of the current knowledge on a specific research topic, laying the groundwork for further exploration.
- Identify ambiguities and contradictions: Highlight any uncertainties or inconsistencies in existing results or data, helping to clarify areas needing further investigation.
- Discuss methodologies and research techniques: Explore the various methods and techniques employed in previous studies, as well as unique perspectives, to inform future research endeavors.
- Develop theoretical frameworks: Contribute to the development of theoretical frameworks by synthesizing existing research findings and proposing new conceptual models or theories.
- Address research gaps and future directions: Identify gaps in the literature and propose future research directions or areas that warrant additional exploration, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the field.
Criteria for Good Review Paper
A good review paper must fulfill three essential criteria, as outlined by Palmatier et al. in 2017:
- Suitable research area: The chosen research area should be conducive to writing a review paper, ensuring that the author can access a substantial body of published literature relevant to the topic.
- Comprehensive content: The review paper should encompass appropriate literature, offering detailed discussions supported by sufficient data and results to bolster interpretations. Additionally, it should employ a persuasive language style to engage readers effectively.
- Innovative insights: Upon completion, the review paper should present significant new ideas to readers, derived from a thorough comparison of published works. These insights contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field.
Furthermore, review papers enjoy widespread readership among researchers, enhancing the likelihood of receiving more citations for the author. Therefore, mastering the art of writing a review paper and identifying suitable journals for publication are important.
Step-by-step guide for writing the best review paper
Here’s a step-by-step guide for writing the best review paper, with an estimated time needed of 20 days and 7 hours:
- Selecting a topic: Start by choosing a suitable area within your research field, defining clear objectives, and outlining specific hypotheses to explore.
- Designing the research: Develop a methodology or protocol tailored to your objectives, ensuring a structured approach to conducting the review.
- Collecting data: Engage in a thorough analysis of published works to gather relevant data and results necessary for your paper.
- Analyzing the data: Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the collected information, examining trends, patterns, comparisons, and relationships within the literature to gain deeper insights.
- Reporting findings: Interpret the results systematically, presenting discussions clearly and using descriptive forms, tables, and figures where appropriate. A thorough analysis of the topic in accordance with the fundamentals should be included in the new insights. Lastly, it is expected of the author to discuss the limitations of the current study from a perspective of the future.
Following these steps diligently will enable you to create a thorough and impactful review paper.
Read the Journal’s Guidelines
Before submitting your review article, it’s important to review the guidelines of the journal you’re considering. Not all journals accept review articles, so ensure that your chosen publication is open to this type of submission. Familiarizing yourself with the journal’s specific requirements will help ensure a smoother submission process.
What to include in a Review Article?
Keywords, Title, and Abstract
Write a suitable and effective title, abstract, and keyword list that are relevant to your review paper. This will make your paper as visible as possible online so that readers may find your work. Your abstract and title should be clear, concise, relevant, and informative.
Write an engaging title and abstract enriched with relevant keywords to enhance the online visibility of your article. Utilize these keywords in subheadings to comprehensively cover the main points, aiding readers in discovering your research. Elevating your review article’s ranking can elevate your authorship prominence, which is particularly crucial in the digital era. This strategy not only amplifies the visibility of your work but also increases the likelihood of appearing in Google Scholar citations.
Introduction
Give a detailed, in-your-own-words introduction to your research that is published in a particular order. Do not summarize the published literature. The introduction should convince readers to read your paper.
Sources of Literature Review
When conducting a literature review, it’s crucial to explore multiple search databases to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant information and research articles. Prioritize the inclusion of recent studies to maintain relevance and diversity in your review. Here are some tips to follow:
- Save all research papers you plan to use.
- Maintain a list of papers you couldn’t access immediately; they may become available through other sources later.
- Register with a site that offers access to a wide range of journal articles.
- Narrow down the scope of your study to focus on gathering only relevant articles.
- Develop a thorough understanding of the topic.
- Include both old and recent studies to enrich your review with valuable insights.
- Always acknowledge authors and co-authors when writing your literature review.
Critical Discussion
Make sure your presentation is a critical discussion rather than a descriptive summary of the topic. If there is conflicting research in your field, be sure to include a discussion component to present both sides of the argument. The contradiction between contradictory works can be resolved in a well-written review paper.
To ensure your review article is original, refrain from merely summarizing the paper. Instead, engage in critical analysis and discussion of all its aspects. Address various research questions and contribute meaningfully to the field. Present a comprehensive analysis of the topic, considering multiple viewpoints rather than focusing solely on one aspect.
Aim for uniqueness, conciseness, clarity, and informativeness in your review. Introduce debate and potentially resolve conflicts between previously published articles. Present your perspective persuasively with these strategies:
- Utilize diverse viewpoints to compare and contrast relevant data.
- Analyze the topic thoroughly, presenting both sides of the argument.
- Keep explanations concise; avoid lengthy elaborations.
- Draw from a range of published articles to review and present ideas.
- Use contradictory opinions to strengthen and support the information and data in your article.
Conclusion and Future Directions
The review paper should accomplish its objectives by ensuring that readers gain clarity on the following questions:
- What insights can they derive from the review paper?
- What aspects of the research area still necessitate further investigation?
Additionally, the conclusion should offer suggestions for future research directions to expand upon the themes discussed in the paper.
When concluding your article, it’s essential to summarize the research paper and provide suggestions for future research areas and potential topics. Your conclusion serves as the essence of the entire paper, capturing its core message and indicating the direction for future exploration.
Keep your conclusion concise, clear, and straightforward. Avoid using complex language and aim for simplicity. The purpose of a good conclusion is to provide a brief summary and outline the future scope of the reviewed topic. There’s no need to elaborate or use overly complex vocabulary.
Acknowledgment
Authors are encouraged to provide a brief acknowledgement of any financial, instrumental, and academic support received for their research work.
References
It is essential to cite references at relevant points in the article to prevent plagiarism. Since each journal has its referencing style, references should be listed at the end of the manuscript. Review papers typically include a higher number of references compared to research papers.
Proofread and Edit
After completing the review article, it’s crucial to proofread and edit the document. This step is essential for identifying typographical errors. Take the time to write the article, and then set it aside for two days. When you come back to review the document with a fresh perspective, you’ll be better able to spot potential mistakes, address language issues, and quickly fill in any missing key information.
Other articles
Please read through some of our other articles with examples and explanations if you’d like to learn more about research methodology.
Statistics
- PLS-SEM model
- Principal Components Analysis
- Multivariate Analysis
- Friedman Test
- Chi-Square Test (Χ²)
- T-test
- SPSS
- Effect Size
- Critical Values in Statistics
- Statistical Analysis
- Calculate the Sample Size for Randomized Controlled Trials
- Covariate in Statistics
- Avoid Common Mistakes in Statistics
- Standard Deviation
- Derivatives & Formulas
- Build a PLS-SEM model using AMOS
- Principal Components Analysis using SPSS
- Statistical Tools
- Type I vs Type II error
- Descriptive and Inferential Statistics
- Microsoft Excel and SPSS
- One-tailed and Two-tailed Test
- Parametric and Non-Parametric Test
Methodology
- Research Methods
- Quantitative Research
- Qualitative Research
- Case Study Research
- Survey Research
- Conclusive Research
- Descriptive Research
- Cross-Sectional Research
- Theoretical Framework
- Conceptual Framework
- Triangulation
- Grounded Theory
- Quasi-Experimental Design
- Mixed Method
- Correlational Research
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Stratified Sampling
- Ethnography
- Ghost Authorship
- Secondary Data Collection
- Primary Data Collection
- Ex-Post-Facto
Research
- Table of Contents
- Dissertation Topic
- Synopsis
- Write Best Review Paper to Get More Citation
- Thesis Statement
- Research Proposal
- Research Questions
- Research Problem
- Research Gap
- Types of Research Gaps
- Variables
- Operationalization of Variables
- Literature Review
- Research Hypothesis
- Questionnaire
- Abstract
- Validity
- Reliability
- Measurement of Scale
- Sampling Techniques
- Acknowledgements